Cicero Studio vs Sorank: agency or SEO software? (2026)

News: on 25 September 2026, Stone Rank Kft. announced in a press release the launch of a "backlink exchange", four days after rewriting its Terms of Use to state that its network "is not a link exchange" (Sorank press release, ABNewswire, 25 September 2026).

Sorank and Cicero Studio both promise to make you visible on Google and in AI answers. Here is what Sorank's pages, archives and terms actually say, and what to check before you hand it your site.

The short answer

Sorank is software that writes and publishes with AI on autopilot. Cicero Studio is an AI-native agency whose founder answers for every article. Before choosing Sorank, read the history of its link network, its refund terms and its liability clauses.

Sorank sells software that researches keywords, writes with AI and publishes to your CMS on autopilot, with an optional link network between its customers. Cicero Studio sells an agency service: a plan built from your business, articles produced with AI and scored before delivery, and a person who answers for them. Before choosing Sorank, read three things: the history of its link network, the real conditions of its refund, and who answers for articles published without review.

Both companies write with AI, and neither needs an SEO team on your side. The difference is not the tool, but what each one does in your name on your site, and who carries the risk when it goes wrong. For the wider question, our guide on SEO software or SEO agency covers the whole market.

Sorank and Cicero Studio at a glance

Sorank vs Cicero Studio: comparison table

Sorank column: its public pages and legal documents read on 30 September 2026, and their archives where stated. Cicero Studio column: our offer on the same date.

Criterion	Sorank	Cicero Studio
Model	Autopilot software	Agency service, AI-native production
Topics	Suggested by the system; you approve them or let it run fully automatically (pricing FAQ)	Plan built from your business, which you can change
Publishing	As drafts, or straight to live without prior review in autopilot mode (Terms of Use §9.7)	Delivered to your CMS after scoring
Responsibility for content	Entirely yours, including what is published automatically (§7, June 2026 archive)	The founder answers for the work delivered
External links	Link network between customers, paid in credits; off by default today, active by default in the terms archived in June 2026 (see below)	No link acquisition
Refund	Only if no page is indexed or shown within 90 days (see below); monthly plans non-refundable	No refund tied to results; deliverables set in writing
Price	$99 or $249 per site per month, no commitment, excl. tax; $49 or $129 per month on annual billing	Not published; set during a call
Starting point	3-day trial, card required	A free article written for your site, then a 30-minute call
Contact	Support by email on Essential, account manager on Pro (pricing)	The founder, directly

Sorank's backlink network: what to read before switching it on

Sorank's backlink network automatically places links between customer sites in exchange for credits. Active by default in June 2026 and off by default today, it has been described as a three-way exchange, then as "not a link exchange".

Sorank's backlink network is an option, off by default today, that automatically places links between the sites of customers who switched it on. Each link received is paid for in credits, which you earn back by hosting a link to another customer on your own articles. The way Sorank describes this mechanism has changed a great deal in a few months.

May 2026: a "three-way" exchange

On 11 May 2026 the feature's page was titled "Backlinks Exchanges" and invited visitors to "Find Backlinks Cited by AI and Order an Insertion". It described the mechanism this way (Wayback Machine archive):

"Site A links to Site B, Site B links to Site C, and Site C links back to Site A. This creates a natural pattern that avoids the reciprocal footprint Google detects."Sorank, Backlinks Exchanges page, archived 11 May 2026

The same page stated that "Google treats these links like natural editorial placements from three separate sites" and that the structure "protects your domain from algorithmic downgrades".

June 2026: credits, and links that must look "natural"

On 30 June 2026 the page described a credit system: "You spend credits to receive a link, and you earn them back by hosting a partner link on your own articles." Its FAQ explained that the network limits how many links circulate between any two domains, "which keeps every placement looking natural. This protects your profile from the footprints search engines penalize." (archive of 30 June 2026).

The Terms of Use archived the same day (archive of 30 June 2026) devoted section 8 to the "Backlink Network". When enabled, "Sorank automatically inserts, modifies, and, where applicable, removes contextual hyperlinks" in the content the user publishes, pointing to other participating sites (§8.1). The network was "active by default" (§8.2): users could switch it off, but did not have to switch it on. Article 8.6 stated that Sorank "relies on third-party data (including Ahrefs and DataForSEO) to match and price links".

On the same date, the Terms and Conditions of Sale of Stone Rank Kft. also covered "link acquisition" services and defined backlinks as "Link placements or sponsored content on third-party websites" (archive of 30 June 2026). Its current Conditions of Sale state that it no longer sells backlinks.

September 2026: "This is not a link exchange"

The current page (sorank.com, read 30 September 2026) says the opposite of the May version:

"This is not a link exchange. No reciprocal A to B swaps, no triangle schemes, the exact patterns Google penalizes."Sorank, backlinks page, read 30 September 2026

The credit mechanism remains: "You spend credits to receive a link and earn them back by hosting one, but never with the same partner." The Terms of Use updated on 21 September 2026 add that the network is free, optional and off by default, that each search engine assesses each link at its sole discretion, and that "The Backlink Network is not a link exchange" (Terms of Use §10).

25 September 2026: a press release speaks of an "exchange" again

Four days after that rewrite, a press release from Stone Rank Kft., datelined Budapest, 25 September 2026 and distributed by ABNewswire, is titled "Backlink Exchange Helps Businesses Earn Real Links on Autopilot". It announces that "Sorank launches a backlink exchange where members earn credits by hosting links and spend them to receive real links from a network of 5,000+ sites" (press release on ABNewswire). The Terms of Use say "not a link exchange"; the same company's press release, four days later, says "backlink exchange".

Earlier versions of the terms mentioned the risk of penalties

In the version archived on 30 June 2026, article 8.4, "Acknowledgment of Risk and Limitation of Liability", read: "The User acknowledges that participating in a link-exchange network may carry risk under search-engine guidelines, and participates of their own free will." It went on: "Sorank shall not be liable for any ranking changes, manual actions, penalties, loss of traffic, or other consequences arising from the User's participation in the Backlink Network." (Wayback Machine archive).

A later version, dated 14 September 2026 and replaced on 21 September, went further according to our reading of 21 September: its article 10.4, on the acknowledgment of search-engine risk, tied that risk explicitly to Google's spam policies on link schemes, and named link devaluation, manual action and loss of visibility. We found no public archive of it (Wayback Machine, archive.today). The current terms state, on the contrary, that the network "is not a link exchange" (§10.1).

What Google says

Google's spam policies define link spam as "the practice of creating links to or from a site primarily for the purpose of manipulating search rankings". The examples listed include "Exchanging goods or services for links", "Excessive link exchanges" and "Using automated programs or services to create links to your site".

A PBN? The question deserves to be asked

A PBN (private blog network) usually means a set of sites used to link to one another in order to influence rankings. We are not saying Sorank's network is one: its sites belong to separate customers, and we have no evidence that Sorank owns any site in the network.

Several facts nonetheless invite the question:

links are placed by a single operator, automatically, between sites that did not choose each other: you "set your niche and the minimum authority you accept", the platform does the rest (backlinks page);
every link received is paid for in credits, earned back by hosting a link to another customer;
in the terms archived in June 2026 the option was active by default: outbound links could be inserted in your articles without any action on your part;
in May and again in June 2026, Sorank presented the mechanism as a way to avoid the footprints Google detects or penalizes;
on 25 September 2026, four days after writing in its terms that the network "is not a link exchange", Sorank announced it in a press release as a "backlink exchange";
its terms archived in June 2026 (and, according to our reading of 21 September, its 14 September version, with no public archive) spoke of a "link-exchange network" and had the user acknowledge a risk under search-engine guidelines.

Sorank states, for its part, in the FAQ of its pricing page: "Editorial placements only, varied anchors, vetted domains, no PBN." An SEO software review site, That Marketing Buddy, writes about Sorank: "Backlink claims need inspection. Exchange networks require relevance and placement review." (review updated 15 September 2026). A SaaSCity review published on 17 September 2026, whose links to Sorank are, by its own disclosure, sponsored placements, also notes: "A pool where every host is also a customer is a closed system, and 'fully aligned with Google's guidelines' is the company's position rather than a certification." (SaaSCity, Sorank review). No one, neither Sorank nor us, can say how Google will judge these links. If you try Sorank, check in your account that this option is switched off: it is off by default today, it was not in June 2026. Cicero Studio does not offer link acquisition. Our article on the risks of automated link exchanges details Google's criteria.

The 90-day refund: what it really covers

Sorank's refund does not cover flat traffic: under its policy (§6.2), it only applies if no page published through Sorank is indexed and none gets a single impression for 90 days.

Sorank's pricing page says: "If your traffic metrics don't improve in 90 days, you get your money back." Its Refund and Cancellation Policy (§6.2) sets a much narrower trigger: the refund applies only if, for the whole 90 days, no page published through Sorank is indexed by Google and Search Console records no impression on that content.

A single impression rules it out. In Google's definition, an impression means a link to your site was seen, or potentially seen, in the results (Search Console Help). A single indexed page shown once is therefore enough to rule out the refund, even if your traffic does not grow.
Eligibility: 90 consecutive paid days on a single site, Sorank content kept live, Search Console connected with access for Stone Rank Kft., a claim within 30 days, one per company (§6.3).
Outside this clause: monthly plans are non-refundable; annual plans can be refunded within 30 days, minus one month counted as used (§5).
Liability cap: in the version archived in June 2026, Sorank's "total liability shall never exceed the total fees paid by the User during the three (3) months preceding the event giving rise to the claim" (Terms of Use §13).

The clause therefore covers content that is never indexed and never shown, not a traffic target. Cicero Studio does not offer a refund tied to results: no one controls a ranking or an AI answer. What we commit to in writing is the volume and cadence of deliverables.

Articles published on autopilot: who answers for them?

The customer. On autopilot, Sorank can publish without review, and its terms archived in June 2026 left the customer solely responsible for that content, with no commitment from Sorank on its accuracy.

In autopilot mode, Sorank can publish straight to your site without prior review (Terms of Use §9.7), up to 60 articles a month on the Pro plan. Yet in the version of its terms archived in June 2026 (§7), the customer is "solely responsible for reviewing, validating, and approving all AI-generated content, whether before or after publication", and Stone Rank Kft. "does not warrant the factual accuracy, completeness, or reliability" of that content. The same section adds that by enabling autopilot, the customer "accepts the associated risks and agrees that Stone Rank Kft. bears no liability for content published automatically on their behalf".

The platform publishes, and you answer for what it publishes. Google does not penalize AI as such, but its scaled content abuse policy targets precisely "Using generative AI tools or other similar tools to generate many pages without adding value for users". What matters is the value of each page, so the material you give the AI and the review that follows. See our article: Google penalizes bad content, not AI content.

What we could not verify

The number of users. The displayed counter went from "+2'000" (May 2026) to "+3'000" (June) and "+5'000" (September). The backlinks page also mentions "more than three thousand daily users in the network". None of these figures can be checked from the outside. On Trustpilot, Sorank has 20 reviews.
Results. Case studies and counters ("2,000,000+ Organic Visitors Added") are published by Sorank, with no accessible Search Console data. We have no independent data on its customers' results.
How the link network works in practice. We have not used the option and do not know which sites take part.

Where Cicero Studio sits

Cicero Studio sells the work, not the software: agency-quality work, software-grade productivity. The method fits in one line: GEO audit + editorial production + automated semantic linking. The plan starts from what your company knows (offers, your customers' questions, documents you share with us), each article is scored before delivery, and the founder answers for the result.

Our Comptoir de l'utilitaire case study shows what that produces: 394 pages published between 4 March and 24 August 2026, 358 of them indexed by Google, for 41,753 organic clicks and 1,561,414 impressions in Search Console, counted from each page's publication date. That is one client, not a forecast.

Our limits too: no published price, no link acquisition or prompt tracking tool, technical issues flagged in the audit but not fixed automatically, and only one public case study so far.

Verdict

Sorank has real strengths: published prices, no commitment and a fast start. But it is a product launched in November 2025, whose description of its link network reversed in four months (and which a press release of 25 September calls a "backlink exchange" again), whose refund promise is far narrower than its slogan, and whose terms archived in June 2026 left the customer solely responsible for articles the platform can publish without review.

If you try Sorank, take three precautions: keep the backlink network switched off until you have read section 10 of its Terms of Use, keep publishing in draft mode so you review before anything goes live, and read section 6 of its refund policy before relying on it.

Choose Cicero Studio if you want a plan built around your business, with no link acquisition, and a person who answers for every article. The budget is set during a call, after a free article written for your site.

How we checked

On 30 September 2026 we re-read Sorank's home, pricing, About and backlinks pages, its Terms of Use, its Terms and Conditions of Sale, its Refund and Cancellation Policy, its Trustpilot profile, its press release of 25 September 2026 and two third-party reviews (That Marketing Buddy, SaaSCity). We consulted the Wayback Machine archives of its backlinks page (11 May and 30 June 2026), its Conditions of Sale (30 June 2026) and its Terms of Use (30 June 2026). The version of its Terms of Use dated 14 September 2026 was read on 21 September 2026. Quotations from Sorank's English pages are verbatim.

What this comparison doesn't cover

This page is written by Cicero Studio, a competitor of Sorank. Read Sorank's pages and independent reviews before deciding.
Sorank's pages may change after 30 September 2026; the versions quoted are dated.
We do not compare the two companies' results: we have no independent data on those of Sorank's customers.
Other SEO and GEO platforms are not covered. For the difference between the two disciplines, see GEO vs SEO.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Cicero Studio and Sorank?

Sorank is autopilot SEO and GEO software: it researches keywords, writes with AI and can publish to your CMS without prior review, at a published price per site. Cicero Studio is an AI-native agency: it builds a plan from your business, produces articles with AI, scores them before delivery and links them automatically, and its founder answers for the work. The budget is set during a call.

Is Sorank's backlink network risk-free?

No one can say so. In May 2026 Sorank described it as a three-way exchange designed to avoid the footprint Google detects; in September 2026, its terms describe a one-way network that "is not a link exchange", while a press release of 25 September 2026 announces it as a "backlink exchange". According to our reading of 21 September 2026 (no public archive), a version of its Terms of Use dated 14 September 2026 had the user acknowledge a risk of link devaluation, manual action or loss of visibility; the version archived on 30 June 2026 already spoke of a "link-exchange network" and of that risk. The option is off by default today; it was active by default in the terms archived in June 2026.

Is Sorank's network a PBN?

We do not claim so: the sites belong to separate customers, and we have no evidence that Sorank owns any site in the network. But links are placed automatically by a single operator, between sites that did not choose each other, and each link received is paid for by hosting a link to another customer. These traits bring the setup close to practices that Google's policies list as link spam. Sorank, for its part, states "no PBN". No one can say how Google will judge these links.

Does Sorank refund you if traffic does not grow?

Not in that case. Its pricing page promises your money back "If your traffic metrics don't improve in 90 days", but its refund policy (§6.2) only triggers if no page published through Sorank is indexed and Search Console records no impression on that content for the whole period. Monthly plans are non-refundable.

Who is responsible for articles published by Sorank?

The customer. In the version of its Terms of Use archived in June 2026 (§7), the customer is solely responsible for reviewing and approving all AI-generated content, before or after publication, and Sorank does not warrant its accuracy. In autopilot mode, articles can go live without prior review (§9.7), and Stone Rank Kft. bears no liability for content published automatically.

How much do Sorank and Cicero Studio cost?

Sorank publishes its prices: $99 (Essential) and $249 (Pro) per site per month, no commitment, excluding tax, or $49 and $129 per month on annual billing, and a Custom plan on request. Cicero Studio does not publish prices: scope and budget are set during a call.

Does Cicero Studio write with AI?

Yes. Articles are produced with AI by our in-house pipeline, scored on an editorial quality grid and rewritten when they fall short, then delivered to your CMS. Cicero Studio does not do link acquisition.

Sources (read 30 September 2026 unless stated otherwise)

Sorank, home page: sorank.com
Sorank, pricing and FAQ: sorank.com/pricing
Sorank, About: sorank.com/about
Sorank, current backlinks page: sorank.com/software-geo/backlinks-acquisition
Sorank, "Backlinks Exchanges" page, Wayback Machine archive of 11 May 2026: web.archive.org
Sorank, "Backlinks Exchanges" page, Wayback Machine archive of 30 June 2026: web.archive.org
Sorank, Terms of Use, §9 and §10, updated 21 September 2026: sorank.com/terms-of-use
Sorank, Terms of Use, version of 14 September 2026, §10.4, read 21 September 2026 (no public archive found)
Sorank, Terms of Use, Wayback Machine archive of 30 June 2026 (§7, §8 Backlink Network, §13, §15): web.archive.org
Sorank, Terms and Conditions of Sale: sorank.com/terms-and-conditions-of-sale; archive of 30 June 2026: web.archive.org
Sorank, Refund and Cancellation Policy, §5 and §6: sorank.com/refund-and-cancellation-policy
Stone Rank Kft., press release "Backlink Exchange Helps Businesses Earn Real Links on Autopilot", 25 September 2026: abnewswire.com
That Marketing Buddy, Sorank review, updated 15 September 2026: thatmarketingbuddy.com
SaaSCity, "Sorank Review 2026", 17 September 2026 (links to Sorank sponsored, per the review): saascity.io
Trustpilot, Sorank profile (4.6/5, 20 reviews): trustpilot.com/review/sorank.com
Google Search Central, spam policies (link spam, scaled content abuse): developers.google.com
Search Console Help, What are impressions, position, and clicks?: support.google.com
Cicero Studio, case study: Comptoir de l'utilitaire

Alexis Dollé

Founder, Cicero Studio

I founded Cicero Studio for businesses that need to be visible on Google and in AI answers but have neither the time nor the team to produce content. I chose to sell a service rather than software because I want to answer for the work delivered, not just for a tool.

View LinkedIn profile

Cicero Studio vs Sorank: agency or SEO software?

TL;DR